Pubcast 5 - The Garage Edition

The year is almost over and it is time for the duo of MD & Johnnyjojoshaboo Sideline Reporter to see out the year in style. Nestled in a secret environment it was time to reflect on the year that has been give out a few awards and raise a few eyebrows.

The cricket gets a bash as recent events are discussed before talking all things football. Then it is time to discuss the highlights & lowlights of the year. The awards aren't forgotten either.

Also please take the time after listening to the pubcast to take the time and vote on the Triple J Hottest 100 2012 for a great Australian band, The Owls with the great song that reminds you of what you would rather be when you listen to Channel 9 commentary "Better Off Deaf" - Vote Here

Podcast Powered By Podbean

Is Cricket Turning Into Baseball?

In what may surprise a few that know me I am at a point where I feel the game of cricket is being destroyed for the sake of money. Yet all that it is going to do is turn away those who love the game and it may never get them back. This summer is seeing some very strange decisions by the officials of cricket in Australia and one has to wonder what their personal vested interest in the game is. I don't think it is for the better of the game at the moment and not even close to the interest of the people who watch the game. Test selectors have decided that bowlers are no longer capable of playing more than two games let alone a whole summer after an alarming rate of bowler break downs during test matches. Many are asking the question as to why so many of our breaking down. I instead ask other questions. Are they picking players who are injured? If they know the players are injury prone why do they rush them back into a side before they prove they can play lots of back to back cricket? Are they doing too much gym work so their bodies are more suited to the quick power bursts rather than for endurance? Is the lure of cash in Twenty20 cricket ruining their ability to bowl line and length and expecting something to happen every ball? This then starts whole new debate on how Twenty20 cricket will eventually ruin the long format of the game if things continue in their current trend. This summer the Big Bash League has raised more negative thoughts and comments than it should have and it seems the media which has a vested interest in the success of the competition has decided that it will not highlight the farce the competition has become. So much focus has been placed on the BBL that the main domestic competition hardly gets a mention yet if not for the Sheffield Shield we would not have any first class cricketers. Many will tell me that the game needs the short format of the game due to the changing nature of the spectator and the need for instant gratification our society now demands. In seeking this instant gratification though some decisions have been made where the old saying comes to mind "That's just not cricket". The first issue that comes to mind is when rain interrupts a game that has already started. While many think the DL is the way to work out calculations it is very flawed in the very short format of the game. The main incident that comes to mind is the Melbourne Stars victory over the Perth Scorchers. Although the Stars may well have deserved to win it can only be seen as a result for the sake of getting a result rather than a washout. When the rules clearly state that a minimum of 5 overs must be bowled to constitute an innings it becomes very questionable that they allow a result in a game where only 2 overs are bowled and the last ball was permitted to be bowled on a pitch where if it was the start of the innings it would not have been. This is something you would never see in a Test Match or One Day International. If the field is not fit for play then no exception should be made. But now there is precedence it will happen many more times. No one likes a chucker in cricket but Twenty20 is going to see a rash of players come though and since the days when Murali was rightly called but due to political reasons in the game was allowed to continue for what should always be seen as a tainted record it makes it harder for officials to call out players. Instead we have a situation where a coach who rightly questions the validity of a player will be sanctioned instead of taking action against the player. If a player has been banned from bowling on one competition due to a suspect action it is baffling as to why they are allowed to bowl in another. With the high speed play required of Twenty20 this is something that will creep in more and more with umpires scared to do anything that will slow down the play. As it is they miss front foot no-bals so I don't expect them to be able to spot chucking either. But then when you see how the umpires who call chuckers are handled when they make the hard calls, I can see why an umpire takes the easy option of saying nothing. Better to have a career that pays rather than the reputation of a good umpire who is out of a job. The way the game is being run all we will be left with though is the short format of the game as everyone fears due to the almighty marketing dollar and we will be left with what will resemble a hybrid baseball game where bowlers are substituted with pinch hitters and any delivery is allowed as long as the game ends in a result. Hopefully though is article is way off the mark and I am not shown to be right in the future.

Pubcast Episode 4 - The Grand Edition

With Christmas closing in & work parties everywhere, a new venue was required. A big thank you to the Grand Hotel in Bundaberg for allowing us to record our humble little pubcast in what looks to be an ongoing relationship.

So settle in with a drink and feel part of the conversation as MD & the Sideline Reporter discuss the sporting issues of the moment.

Cricket – Big Bash Big Fizzle or were the Heat dudded? But what a finish to game 2.  Bird is great until he wears Green & Gold.  The rain fiasco. DL – Should be no result or does DL mean something else for the sake of a result?

#NRL – Greedy or worthy, are the players looking out for the youth or lining the top flight players pockets?  Boxing, Gallen, Mason, Vatuvei & Bird?  Should the name Hopoate be banned from Sport?

#Tinkler Tinkler , Are Newcastle here no more? What is it with fat mining magnates?

#ALeague – Is Burns the Dirtiest player in the A-League.  Snipers in Italy.

The Jacob Burns Drinking Game:

Perth Glory tweets a pic of Jacob shirtless reading a match programme before the game – three fingers.

Cleans out the opposition’s best player accidentally on purpose – two fingers

Booked in the first 10 minutes – finish your drink

Draws blood – two shots

Twists an ear / nipple / random body part of another player – two fingers

Commentator says “He’s not that type of player” – one finger

Takes out his own player in a tackle – two fingers

Fixes his side parting mid game – three fingers

Assist – three fingers

Goal – four fingers

Three votes in the Alex Tobin Award – finish your drink

Someone on Twitter immediately makes a joke about Thomas Broich – two fingers, unfollow them

Makes it through 90 minutes without getting booked – drink lots, the apocalypse is coming

#Football – ROAR & Liverpool coverage & Messi.

Awards for 2012

Marto

Bryce

SSO Fail

Podcast Powered By Podbean

Pubcast Episode 3

Hey, grab a beer, knock the top off, sit down and join in on the conversation as MD & the Sideline Reporter discuss the sporting week at the Coral Cove Resort.

Also the Sideline reporter explains why he dressed up as Santa and went for a run on a Sunday morning. I am trying to find some photo evidence.

Howzat: The test is over and what an shambolic performance by Australia, but who is to blame. Is the new Test lineup the right way to go? Also the BBL has started and a quick review is made and a bit of a laugh is had as the new technology is discussed. Even a flasher gets a mention in this segment. And we are still plugging #givebenabowl & #givejoeago

I See Red:  The A-League is in trouble if the standard of refereeing stays the same and the match review officials keep making poor decisions after Broich was sent off for doing nothing and the Sydney FC player gets away with a stomping tackle to the back of a leg with no case to answer. Don't be surprised if MD gives his beloved Liverpool FC a mention as well after they qualified top of their group in the Europa League.

Game In Heaven:  Finally it is known what Folau is doing, but is he chasing money or seriously trying to challenge himself and set a great record of being the best multi-sport international? A chance isn't missed either to mention the All Blacks lost to England either.

Simply The Best:  That Bronco's Jersey, ground breaking, slightly different but we like it. Was it designed before the shoulder charge was banned?

Awards: 

Might be a few contenders for the Marto Award. If you watch the cricket you might understand why some or most of the commentators get a mention. Some unkind words about one in particular too.

The Bryce nomination was a unanimous decision and if the FFA keep getting themselves nominated it could be upgraded to the man at the top. The Muppet.

Also it has been decided that the poor form award will be known as the SSO Fail ward. MD self nominated here for failing to have any nominations but the challenge is out there.

Don't forget there is a challenge for South Sydney fans to turn up to the pubcast.

Podcast Powered By Podbean

 

Pubcast Episode 2

We didn't stuff up too much last week and turned out for another recording of the Sporting Sport Opinions Pubcast from the bar at Coral Cove Resort.

In another pro-Australian & Queensland Episode we delved into a few issues that occurred over the last week while we enjoyed a few Summers in preparation for the start of summer.. We don't like being dull but the mention of the word brings to though only one thing - South Africa's batting. Ricky Ponting's retirement gets a mention as well as the selection decision for the 3rd test and who should of been there. #givebenabowl is a growing campaign.

Rugby is in the headlines for all the wrong reasons. Is Quade Cooper a boxer or chasing money like Folau & is the IRB judiciary a farce to scared to deal harsh punishments after a meagre suspension to Andrew Hore. The Kiwi's start copping a bit of flack but it is all in good jest.

If you are a South Sydney supporter then this is worthy of a listen as we give the Falcon a mention as we announce an interesting challenge. Also a sneak peak for the Brisbane Heat fans in put out as a teaser.

Reports may have been circulating of Bundaberg's own "Pump Up The Volume" occurring on the coast but a visit from the boys in blue ensured that the pubcast is ok.

The Awards wrap things up as more candidates put their hand up for the Marto, Bryce & Poor Form award. Listener nominations are always welcome but need to be backed up with photo, video evidence or just a well written reason. 

As always we thank you for listening and welcome your thoughts and comments.

Podcast Powered By Podbean

Weekend Wrap

Another installment of the weekend wrap and all being well it should be a regular item again.



Was It A Good Draw?

Australia had South Africa on the ropes in Adelaide in the 2nd test match but down a strike bowler in Pttinson, they couldn't deliver the final punch required to seal the victory. Many in the media have spent the day talking about how great an effort it was by both sides but in particular South Africa for holding onto a draw but I would beg to differ.  Whilst a close draw can be exciting and have you on the edge of your seat, it can also be crowd killing. Like it or not the modern game is constantly under threat from the shorter format with society now demanding results and exciting cricket.

After a draw in Brisbane it was looking like Adelaide was going to end in a result after Australia scored so quickly in the first innings.On a pitch that produced a first innings score of 550 @ 5.12 runs per over, South Africa seemed to dawdle in their first dig to score 388 @ 3.18 rpo. Maybe the pitch was starting to slow up but with Australia scoring at 3.81 runs in their 2nd innings it seemed that it wasn't a testing pitch to score runs on.

This is where I get frustrated with South Africa. Their run rate ability. Although they lost early wickets on day four, no one would have expected a run rate of 1.68.  To highlight how slow they went, AB de Villiers faced the most balls without scoring a boundary in test cricket. His return of 33 runs off 220 balls is not going to attract people to test cricket.

You may think I am being overly critical but I look at it differently.  If South Africa took a more pro-active approach to their batting they may have even changed the result of the first test match when Amla & Kallis meandered along once they were settled into their innings. Then you take the 2nd test match. There were no demons in the pitch so if they managed to get an extra run every second over in the first innings there is another 60 runs. Then take the second innings and if they look to score at a pedestrian 3 an over there is an extra 140 odd runs. South Africa at the close of play were 181 runs short of the target Australia set. Although attacking cricket may have seen more wickets and a loss to South Africa, it is a sign that their negative mindset when at the crease is not going to win them matches like this. Considering they are the number one test match it is an interesting scenario. Imagine how exciting the game would have been if South Africa were close to the target.

Where Now For The Roar

Something is amiss in Brisbane and the team is on the verge of imploding. Every other team and the media are more than happy to stick the daggers into Brisbane during the struggle they are in, so they need to show resolve and not tear each other apart in the down times. Comments that have been coming from the coach are some that may be better said behind closed doors. If Brisbane keep on playing like they are I expect them to be chasing a coach soon. As everyone knows, it is easier to change a coach then a playing roster. Look for a mention of the McBreen tackle on Smith in Friday's pubcast.

Up And Away

On a beautiful Friday evening typical of Queensland, my sideline reporter and I sat down to record the first pubcast for Sporting Sport Opinions. We were venturing into unknown territory but had great faith in our idea and after 44 minutes a calypso high five was produced. With no hitches during the show we will recording our pubcast every Friday afternoon at the Coral Cove Resort in the bar area. If you are ever in Bundaberg feel free to drop in and watch and hang around for a chat. Who knows you might even feel the urge to participate and discuss the sporting world.

Debut Podcast By The Reef Episode 1

With nervous excitement after weeks of planning the scene was set for the debut podcast out of the bar at the Coral Cove Bistro on the scenic Coral Cove Golf Coarse overlooking the ocean. Some choice beverages were ready, the equipment tested and we were ready to go.

Not knowing what we were really delving into, my sideline reporter - Johnnyjojoshabadoo aka John and myself cracked the first beer and we were off. It was harder trying to figure out how to upload the audio to i-tunes then it was to do the show. 

The debut episode covered:

Introduction:

Welcome to the first ever Sporting Sport Opinions Podcast. Taking in all things sport that the media won't delve into. No subject is unwarranted but a warning must be in place. If you are looking for a neutral Commentary on the sporting world then you have tuned into the wrong place. We will be unashamedly bias towards all things Australian, furthermore we are Queenslanders and proud of the fact.

Straight off the bat - The Test match, is Michael Clarke a once in a generation player?

The NRL Draw - who won, the fans, the clubs or Channel 9?

Shoulder Charge - An issue that won't die.

ARU - Do they understand contracts in sport or is it a tactic to remove Quade Cooper

Is Beckham Coming to the A-League or is Gallop just dreaming?

SSO Awards - Bryce Lawrence nomination for Bias & The Poor Form Nomination

Thoughts for the weekend and sporting highlight of the week.

Podcast Powered By Podbean

Shoulder Charge Banned

The Australian Rugby League Commission has made the extraordinary decision to ban the shoulder charge at all levels of the NRL from 2013.  After reviewing a detailed report into shoulder charges it deemed that they pose an unacceptable risk in the game.

Reviewing some of the statistics that have been highlighted by the ARLC is it really that big a problem?


Statistcs noted are as follows:

Shoulder charges made up .05% of tackles in 2012.

So of the 142,355 tackles there were 71 shoulder charges. In the NRL season there were 201 matches which equates to one shoulder charge every 2.8 games.

5% of shoulder charges resulted in injury to either the defensive (1%) or the offensive (less than 4%) player.

So of the 71 shoulder charges effectively 4 tackles caused injury. 1 to a defensive player and 3 to an attacking player. One could argue that more players are injured due to poor ground conditions.

Essentially the ARLC has imposed a ban on a tackle that occurs every 2.8 games and results in injury every 40th game played. Rugby League is a high impact game where big hits are a large part of what draws the crowd. Has it made a rash decision to stamp out a play that it could have just imposed suspensions for high contact when it occurred. Whilst the safety of players needs to be paramount the ARLC also needs to ensure that it doesn't change the fabric of the game in the process. I can't see the ARLC getting too many supporters or players on their side with this decision even it is a tackle that occurs very rarely.

For a more detailed look into the shoulder charge ban go to my article on Armchair Selector -

Shoulder Charge Bane - Proactive or Reactive?

What Is The A.R.U. Doing?

With reports abound that Quade Cooper has quit Australian Rugby, the wisdom of the officials has to be questioned. Although nothing official has been announced, the ARU has placed Cooper in a position where no positive outcome can be seen for the game.

Since the World Cup, Cooper has been the scapegoat for the ARU and media alike for everything that is going wrong with the Australian team. When Cooper made alegations of a toxic environment and imposed a fine of $40,000 and a suspended 3 match ban for his comments, there was only going to be one of two outcomes. Cooper accepted the punishment and both parties move on in a positive direction.

Instead it seems that the ARU felt that Cooper still needed to be punished and offered a new contract that can only be seen as either an insult or a sign to Cooper that he was no longer wanted. Why would the ARU offer a 24 year old player, who at his peak is one of the best game breakers in the game and undeniably the best in his position, a low-grade incentive contract that is usually the norm for rookie players who are yet to establish themselves at the top level. 

Considering the Rugby Union Players Association questioned the severity of the punishment and whether or not it was allowable under the collective bargaining agreement now gains more momentum. If the ARU is seen to be punishing Cooper further then it can only be seen that he is no longer wanted in Australian Rugby but instead of cancelling his contract which may have led to legal action they have tried to make Cooper quit.

If the reports of Cooper quitting are just a smokescreen to test the ARU and see if they offer a topped up contract is a gamble that may end poorly for both. Cooper is obviously on the outer in an organisation that has shown it has little regard for his services and if he is bluffing he will find he is looking for a new job very quickly. Is this how the ARU wants to be seen though? If Cooper walks away from the game the ARU might find more stories start coming to light and they won't be in a position to sanction or punish.

If Cooper does walk away from the game and blames the ARU then it will be interesting to see the reaction from the Queensland Reds. Will they look to take action against the ARU for compensation, which they would be quite entitled to do. 

It won't be long until the truth is known but the sentiments will stay the same. Quade Cooper is right. The ARU is toxic and it needs a clean out. Not of players though, this time the officials need to be evaluated.

It's Just Un-Australian

Bundaberg Rum is pulling out of sponsorship of all Australian sport and only focusing on international sporting events. If my sources are correct this is a major blow to the NRL at a time when it cannot afford to lose major sponsors after Harvey Norman also pulled out earlier in the year as the major sponsor of State of Origin.

As a resident of Bundaberg it is intriguing to hear that an Iconic Australian drink no longer wants to be associated with sport within the country and is only focused on the international scene. This would indicate that Bundaberg Rum is preparing to make a global launch of it's brand.

The NRL currently states Bundaberg Rum as "the proud naming-rights sponsor of Bundaberg Friday Night Football, Bundaberg Super Saturday Football and the official dark rum of the National Rugby League".  This highlights either the NRL don't know yet or are waiting for an official announcement from the international owners, Diageo, before any statements are made. If the facts are true, the NRL needs to make a move quickly in a market where sponsorship if highly competitive.

Diageo also needs to be careful in how it handles this situation. Everyone know Bundaberg Rum is a well established drink within Australia but a poorly handled change in sponsorship strategy that may be seen as Un-Australian could have a damaging effect on the brand that may cost more than what the sponsorship did.

Strange Things Are Afoot At Sydney FC

That is how I view Sydney FC at the current moment. As a neutral sitting in the stands on Saturday night to watch Sydney FC take on Melbourne Victory many thoughts were going through my head as I took in the atmosphere and feeling of the parochial crowd.

After an embarrassing drubbing at the hands of Central coast on a week earlier, it was still no surprise that a 20,000 plus crowd turned up to watch the Sky Blues. The Cove was full and in full voice from the start. It seemed that many in the crowd were there for one reason only and that was confirmed when the team was announced. At the announcement and the arrival on the field of Alessandro Del Piero brought the crowd to life. Sydney could have lost 20 nil last week and they all still would have turned up to see there football hero. Sydney loves an event.

Before the game started I had no doubt that if Sydney capitulated again there would be serious questions asked of the team and especially the coaching staff. By half time with Sydney at 1-0 the Cove were in full voice and the fans were in a nervous excitement. When Pascal Bosschaart scored his first ever professional goal the crowd was buzzing and preparing to party the night away.

All this was to change though in the 66th minute when Del Piero was substituted. Although many are critical with this decision, I would maintain it was the right one. With Del Piero returning from a hamstring injury and starting to struggle, it was not worth the risk of further injury to a player that is worth so much to the team both on and off the field. This raises an issue that I hope is not the problem. Everyone agrees that Del Piero has been a masterstroke signing and marketing coupe for the game and the attraction of extra supporters to the ground and the merchandising bonanza he has brought the club has been worth it. What you do not want to see is that he is kept on the ground for the marketing reason rather for team tactical reasons and player injury management. If he is run into the ground every game, he will not last the season.

Last thing Victory's Adrian Leijer wanted was for a Del Piero free kick to connect the same spot as the five stitches he received after a head collision

The substitution brought out the fears I feel most in Sydney wish was not there. Without Del Piero on the field the teams structure holds in place as well has the little pigs straw house. Although Sydney capitulated and lost in an an amazing blitz in the last 12 minuted from Melbourne, they always looked vulnerable. As soon as Melbourne scored their first, there was a sense that the crowd knew that only luck would allow Sydney to hold on for a win. The faith amongst the fairweather fans is not very good.

When the final whistle blew and Sydney were leaving the field as losers, the next few days were always going to be interesting. Sitting at the airport early on Sunday morning I was waiting for news of a "please explain" from the club to coach, Ian Crook. I was a little surprised to land to the news that Ian Crook has resigned but in the end it was the only move he could make. As soon as he found himself in a situation where he was explaining himself to loyal supporters in the aftermath of the game, the writing was on the wall. If he feels he needs to explain himself to the supporters so quickly after a game, then he may as well go to the pub before the game to get his tactics.

Where to for Sydney though?  I am sure that when they signed Del Piero they never imagined such a  scenario where the were after their 7th coach in eight years. This is not a good sign for a proud club. Coaches come and go but if you average little more than a coach a season, then there will never be a real structure in place and the management of the club must come under scrutiny. It is also make you wonder if coaching Sydney FC is seen as a poisoned chalice. Sydeny FC supporters will need to hope that a quality replacement is found quickly, but they also need to support and back the coach and realise it may take time for improvement.

The Sydney Trip: Part 1

Not my normal sort of article but one I would like to share.

As I am a member of the Football Media Association I was given the opportunity to attend a Professional Development Day focusing on social Media. As I am a blogger and a facebook/twitter addict this was a good opportunity to learn and make sure that I know how it should be done by a journalist.

Thanks to the Johnny Warren Foundation I was flown down to Sydney to attend the day and a few more to take in an A-League game. My thanks can not be said enough for this opportunity. This though created a situation I never thought would be conquered. Firstly, I have a fear of flying. I had never flown before and with a history of collapsed lungs knew that flying was a major risk (mainly long distance flights, ie: overseas) but a fear nonetheless. Once the flights were booked though I knew I couldn't turn back but was that nervous at the airport waiting, I was shaking.  Although the air-con was cold so for now I am blaming it.

From the Moment I checked in though I knew it was all meant to be. Someone I knew was at check in and from there in I seemed to get special service. I was on a Dash-8 to Brisbane which didn't give me much confidence but seated next to me was someone who was part of a flight school and had flown a lot. They kept me distracted and once the plane was in the air, it became one of the best experiences in my life.

This is where the second issue arises. For those who don't know, I have facial agnosia, which is the inability to recognise faces and from that I have an anxiety of sorts about being at large gatherings or on my own in unfamiliar places. Brisbane airport was an overwhelming experience but it seemed that every staff member that dealt with me knew. Once I got on the plane to Sydney all my fears of flying were gone and all I wanted to do was watch the scenery out the window. I think I now have a want to fly more. Major fear conquered.

Once in Sydney though my anxiety kicked in again. Stars were aligned though and from landing onwards it has all been good. Taxi driver was excellent and hotel staff have been brilliant (gotta love housekeeping that sorts your clothes out for you)  and the food is great. Also Bundaberg needs to send people down so they can learn to make coffee.

Today was the main reason for the trip. A Professional Development Day for the Football Media Association on Social Media by Julie Posetti. I can confidently say that in Bundaberg I might be one of the most knowledgeable people on how social media should be used by journalists. To have had the opportunity to be trained and meet Julie is an honour and one I never thought I would get. One of the best, if not best, trainers/facilitators/teachers I have ever had. Now I think I have to start hassling the local paper. As a socially awkward person though it took me awhile to relax and talk to those attending. Very grateful that I did though. My passion could now grow to an obsession.

After talking to Julie my passion for sports writing has grown and I now have the confidence to write the article I have been sitting on for awhile but it will take time. Next stage is tomorrow where I will be at a pubcast that talks all that is football and it will be another test of my social awkwardness and if I conquer it I know I am doing the right thing.

Football Drama

The weekend was a football show piece of what ruins a great game.  In all cases in caused for game changing situations and affected the final result. Sport in itself sees plenty of poor decisions and it is something that will always happen as human error is always bound to occur. But it is when mistakes are made that should never happen that cause greater concern. The main incidents I am referring to are the disallowed offside goal in the EPL during the Everton v Liverpool game and back home in the A-League it was the dive by Adelaide's Geronimo after being interfered with by Wellington's Ben Sigmund.

Offside?? Never!!

The rest of the article can be read at....The Armchair Selector

Rugby 4th Stringers Do Alright

On Saturday night the World Champion New Zealand Rugby Union team ran out their strongest side possible and approached the game like they just needed to turn up. What they didn't account for was a resilient 4th string Australian side to stand up and play with pride and determination, something that has been missing all season. Considering Australia had about ten players who would not have been selected if all players were eligible it was a good result for Australia even if it was a draw.

Australia needed to come out strong early and show New Zealand that it was not going to be a cake walk for a side that is used to winning.  Also Australia needed to play a whole game and not just glimpses here and there.  In general it was Australia's defence that ensured the game was drawn and to hold a New Zealand side tryless is no mean feat.

What I want to talk about though are the two areas in the game that cost Australia victory............

The rest of this article can be read at The Armchair Selector


I have joined forces with The Armchair Selector after being approached to submit articles to the site.  I will still be writing articles here but you will notice that not all articles can be fully read here.

Why Take A Flare?

When going to a game a supporter ensures they have certain things in their possession to take to the game. They ensure they are attired in their teams colours, their ticket for the game is on hand, money to cover the cost of the celebratory ales before, during and after the game, flags and signs heralding their team and favourite players and of course the chants that have been put to memory to shout during the game. All of this I can understand, where I fail to follow the logic though is when the supporter makes sure that the flare is carefully concealed before they head off.

Whilst setting off flares is a common happening in football, one has to ask why? Fans are not only letting flares go off in the stands now though they are taking the idiotic decision to throw them onto the playing surface or as seen recently at the VPL Grand Final a supporter took it to a new level when they fired a flare across the ground.

When a flare goes off questions are rightly asked of ground security and how the supporter was able to get it into the ground. With with such stringent security at grounds now this is a legitimate question. When I see a flare go off though, I always question the intelligence of the person that set it off and the people around them that surely knew it was going to happen.  

Something else that eludes me to the whole childish concept is why it is seen to be a good idea by the intending culprits. Even stranger is why someone would think it is smart to fire one across a ground where the only thing that is going to come from it is most likely an injury or worse. The game is quite happy to vilify publicly a player on the field who dives, maybe it is time for the game to start doing the same to offending people who set off flares. Lengthy bans are always a necessity but a little public humiliation could do so much more.

Dog Act by A Bulldog

2012 for the NRL will never be forgotten and it is unfortunately for all the wrong reason. In a season ruined by video refs everyone was very worried that they would have the final say on who were the premiers for 2012. This in one way was luckily not the case but instead we are now dealing with an issue that is one of the  worst I have ever witnessed in sport. So instead of talking about the game lets highlight an incident that will go down as one of the worst the game has seen and should be dealt with accordingly.

Before I prattle on though take a look at the incident itself.

The Dog Act

This incident raises many issues.

1.  Why did the referees not ask for it to be reviewed when after all, this is what the judiciary will do. If the game is happy to stop everything for more than five minutes to review a try or a melee, why did they not take what could have been seen within 5 minutes was obvious to everyone else. Why are the referees so scared to send players off. A player can commit a high tackle or similar and get sent off after a review, so why change it now.

2.  How can a the Bulldogs as a club or any supporter of the club from this point forward want this player as part of their organisation?

3.  Why did the commentators gloss over this issue so easily yet make more complaints about strips that were rules as knock-ons.

For one I am glad that this player did not end up affecting the end result of the game. What I cannot understand is how they managed to finish the game. What needs to happen from here though must be a hard stance and carried out very quickly. A very long suspension at minimum is required, and personally I would like to see this player rubbed out of the game for good. No normal person in their right mind takes this action and the game needs to acknowledge that. If allowed to ever play the game again in the NRL then he and the NRL also have to be accept that every game, opposition players are allowed to say "watch out, make sure he doesn't bite you". If the NRL doesn't want this to happen then a life ban is the only option.

If the Bulldogs as a club want to retain any respect then it should act on this issue very quickly, accept any punishment the player receives without fighting it and then terminate the contract of James Graham. Rarely do I swear on twitter or facebook, let alone in my club but this is a rare instance that has caused that. I have commented on many issues through the season and admit to be very vocal about certain issues but on this occasion, if the NRL take a soft stance then it is going to lose a lot of fans and sponsors in the process as it will be highlighted as a grubs game.  

NRL Heralds Drugs & Racism

On a day that should be celebrated in Rugby League circles will now be seen as one of the darkest days and one that will tarnish forever the reputation of the game. In some strange wisdom the 8th person named as a Rugby League Immortal was Andrew Johns.

The award is judged purely on playing ability and character & off-field incidents are not taken into account but in this situation the premise of this so called honour has been shown to be a blight on the game. Regardless of what you think of Andrew Johns playing ability he is a player that should have had all his records wiped from the books and never mentioned in high regards.

Andrew Johns is a self confessed drug cheat who only came forward after he was caught in possession whilst overseas in London after his career was over. Although he never tested positive any player who confesses to a long history of drug taking through their career should be wiped from the game. Johns himself admitted that he had taken drugs for about ten years throughout his career and it was in a need to escape the pressure and to be able to cope. With this said, if John's never took drugs he most likely would never have reached the heights he did and therefore needed the drugs to reach the levels he did. On this basis alone Johns should never be held in high regard, let alone be made an immortal of the game. It also needs to be pointed out that Johns would never have come forward about his past drug taking if he was not caught.

Also to be considered is the racist comments made by Johns that were aimed at Inglis and Folau that caused Timanah Tahu to walk out of State of Origin in 2010. The comments made are not ones I will repeat but it is not hard to find exactly what was said. This incident also was not a one off and it is claimed that Johns has a history of using racist terms.

Now Rugby League has the great honour of one of it's Immortals forever tarnishing it's image with the spectre of drugs and racism.

Worst Team in the NRL 2012

Which team was the worst performing team in the NRL for 2012?  If you look at the ladder it is with out a doubt Parramatta.  If you go by coaches being sacked then you would still go with Parramatta, although if you add in potential Parramatta are still contenders but West Tigers are a close second.

If you take into consideration a team that has made errors almost every game that have cost sides tries, gifted tries that should never have been, and on many occasions made calls that no one agrees with then it is no surprise that the team that should be granted the title as The Worst Team in the NRL for 2012 is the referees.

From the start of the season the referees have been in the headlines for all the wrong reasons and leading up to the grand final it has not changed but if anything it has gotten worse. What makes it frustrating is when it is the Video referee that is making the biggest mistakes and that is with the benefit of using a replay, slow motion and sometimes with a second person to help get the decision right. How is it that the officials are not improving but getting worse yet are still considered to be the best for the job. Are there that few coming through the ranks?  Considering that the referees all get training and have a coach and management team in Bill Harrigan and Stuart Raper, who is it that should be held accountable? Every time a referee makes a poor decision the standard response is for them to be stood down for a week, the only trouble is with so many of them making mistakes they can't all be stood down. When a team usually performs so poorly over a season you rarely see the coach keep his job and for the latter part of 2012 the same is being asked of the referees coaches. How is it that Harrigan and Raper have not been stood down?  Now we are in a position where everyone is fearing the Grand Final will be marred by another mistake.

The NRL has put itself in a position that is unwinnable. At the end of the season there will be an overhaul of the officials and changes must come, it is just a matter of what change and if it is the right change. Anything it does though will not fix the damage done and I cannot see the NRL admitting they got things wrong with the current situation. But what can be done?

The first thing that needs to go is what every one seems to be agreeing on. Benefit of Doubt. This is the video ref get out clause and it has to go. If the video ref is unable to say one way or the other, Try or no try, then it should always go back to the referee on the field. Also if the insistence is there to keep using the video replay in frame by frame slow motion to adjudicate tries then until the vision is in High Definition then it should not be used. Surely if the game is worth spending a billion dollars on for the rights then they can afford to use the best technology. Channel 9 are always boasting about the technology in cameras for cricket, why can't they invest in the NRL?

Is 2 referees working?  Not in it's current format. There should only ever be one official in charge. The second referee is adding confusion to the game for the players in interpretation of the ten and ruck infringements. The pocket referee should only be there as a spotter and nothing more. Only one referee should hold a whistle.

Is the game getting too fast?  Possibly but with wrestling techniques it is also getting more bogged down. The inception of interchange has unfortunately advanced the game very quickly, if not too quickly.  This is the one area I would like to see the NRL tinker with. I believe 4 players on the bench and 8 interchanges is not working for the good of the game.  I was always a fan of the old system where you could only make replacements but we know that is not going to happen. Instead I would like to see a system similar to what the AFL is using but with modification.  Why not allow a team to have an extended bench but be limited in how that bench can be used. For example if a team is allowed 6 players on the bench, two of whom can be used in 4 interchanges for the match. With the reaming 4 players a team is allowed 2 replacements. If a player is taken out in an illegal hit that is put on report then a free replacement is allowed. This might not be a perfect solution but something needs to be changed in this area. This will also see fatigue become more of an issue in the final ten minutes of each half.

Regardless of what happens and what the NRL does, there will be many critics who are not happy and next year will see more mistakes. Mistakes are human, but when the same mistakes keep happening that is incompetence.

NRL Preliminary Finals

Only 2 games left to finalise the Grand Final combatants and it all said and done about who will be there on the day. Of the two preliminary finals there are two teams that deserve to get through and two that don;t but that doesn't mean it is going to pan out that way. Unfortunately with a season where all the headlines have been about referee blunders and in particular blunders where the referee in the box who has all day and countless replays to get it right, it seems there is still a major mistake yet to be made before this season is over. What is also interesting is that of the teams left are probably the coaches that complain the most about the men in control.

Melbourne Storm vs Sea-Eagles

This will be one hotly contested grudge match and neither team will leave anything in the tank in ensuring victory.  With Manly losing their first semi and looking very ordinary at time as well as a victory that is soured by blatant mistakes by the officials it is hard to look at Manly as a real contender but it is hard to discount a team that is favourably looked upon. Melbourne on the other hand were clinical in their first semi and with a week rest another similar performance will put any hopes Manly have of a Finals appearance out the window. Which ever teams comes out of this one it will be at a cost though and injuries will be a concern jsut as much as possible suspensions if tensions get out of control.

Melbourne will close this one out within 60 minutes but an all in brawl will have them waiting nervously before week one.  Also don;t be surprised if a key player from either side is targeted in a cheap shot in this game. Melbourne by 8.


Canterbury Bulldogs vs Souths Rabbitohs

The Bulldogs have been the most consistent team all year and would be very unlucky to not make the final. Although they won in the first week of semi's it was not a very convincing performance and manly were very ordinary. A repeat performance against Souths will have many Bulldogs supporters worried. Souths on the other hand have nothing t lose. No one really expects them to win but if they can rattle the Bulldogs in the forwards then it will be a different story. The fullback battle between Inglis & Barba is the talking point but the forward battle needs to be won for either of these players to dominate.  For some reason I am sensing that the Bulldogs will get a bit of stage fright and lose the battle mentally. This one will be a big scoring affair and a freakish try will be all that separates them. Souths are just as likely to self implode though and it will be all over very quick if Souths don't control the ball and the enthusiasm.

Souths will sneak home in the last 5 minutes but expect a few battered and bruised forwards and some nervous waits over high shots and lifting tackles.  Don't be surprised if either side targets the fullback for some rough treatment. Souths by 6

NRL - Self Damage

Glasses don't help those who are incompetent

The game of Rugby League is very strong. You know this to be true when you see all the damage that is happening to the game and yet it still continues on. Over the years the game has seen many scandals, court battles, negative media and of the course the Super League battle, yet here it is still as strong as it always has been.

Can the game keep damaging itself though and expect to survive?  The game is now at a point where most do not know how a game will pan out and the players have nothing to do with it. It all comes down to whether or not the officials who make the calls over the eighty minutes get it right or not.  The biggest worry all year is that a referee blunder is going to cost a team the Grand Final and in a way it has already happened. The game between the North Queensland Cowboys and Manly Sea-Eagles has already influenced the Grand-Final. There were so many errors in this game that one has to question Manly's right to contest the right to make the final.

Manly may have gone on to win but change a call or two to the correct one and the rest of the game is completely different. What I cannot understand is that if the video referees are seeing the same images that we see then how can they get it so wrong?  Is it time for the NRL to admit that the referees in the box are not up to standard and ex-players and even arm chair experts should be sitting in the control room. I will even throw another conspiracy into the mix. It may not be the case but when the network has control over the images, why is it that later in a game or after a game there is suddenly a better angle or clearer image that could not be found earlier.

I would like to see the benefit of doubt decision thrown out when it comes to video ref decisions. If the video ref cannot see conclusively what has happened then it should always be referred to the referee on the field. It also appears that logic is thrown out the window when they are not sure. If the game continues on in the same vain for the rest of the season and nothing changes next year then fans will start walking away from the game. The NRL for to long has allowed the standard of officials to slip behind and adding a 2nd referee on the field is just allowing them to be more complacent, knowing that there is a fall back if they cannot see something.

Also if the game is going to fast and getting ahead of the game then maybe it is there are other avenues to explore. Nothing has sped up the game more than the interchange and this is a rule that needs to be overhauled.  If it was good enough in the past for reserves only then why are our footballers of today who are supposed to be fitter and stronger unable to play without interchange.

Fans and players all understand referees can make mistakes but it is the continued mistakes happening every week that are the problem. Once the season is over the commission has a lot of work to do but it needs to know that next year if it is still damaging it's own game it will make negative ground.

St Luke's North Bundaberg 2012 Review

The 2012 season for the St Luke's/North Bundaberg Under 9 Small Sided Football team finishes this weekend and it is time to reflect back on the season and the players.

The season started with 6 new players, a doubling of previous seasons numbers. With 12 players now it proved a great challenge at games and training.  Whilst I not only had to try and get to know more new faces which is a struggle for anyone with my condition (facial agnosia), especially with all the new parents to get to know as well,  I also had to adjust to training and rotating a much larger squad which was a luxury I have never been afforded in the past. From the start of the season the improvement seen is one that as a coach I can not be happier with. To see personal development in every player is all that I can ask for but to also see the growth and development of the team and the structure of the playing style is one that  the boys can take great pride in.

Personally each boy has developed greatly from what was seen in the first game of the season.

Aiden - One of my key defenders. At the start of the season Aiden was a kick and watch player. Whilst Aiden has a "cracker" of a kick, the battle was always to get him to make the right choice in when to kick and get away from trying to blast every kick out of the park. The focus I have seen in the latter part of the season and the runs that Aiden is starting to show is putting him in good stead for next year. In the future I can see Aiden as a crucial player at free kicks or the goal scoring fullback that presents at corners.

Alex - Another one of my defenders but this year saw Alex progress into a wing player who could give anyone a start and chase them down in defence.  Alex also found his feet in passing and tackling and has vastly improved in his timing and technique. His reading of play is something that I have seen great growth in and with natural speed Alex will be a much more prominant figure in runs down the wing. Alex will be that player who you always see clearing the ball from defence or being that last man in defence putting pressure on the striker.

Alistair - Goalkeeper of choice or midfielder. Whenever a goalkeeper was required you could be sure that Alistair would put up his hand. Never afraid to put his body on the line, Alistair took great pride in keeping a clean sheet and was never afraid to tell his players what they should be doing. If not in goals Alistair could always be counted on in trying to take the ball forward and setting up players in attack. The future I see for Alistair though is in goals and with his determination and fearless attack on the ball have him ready to make great progress.

Chris - A midfielder in the making. Chris has developed from a spectator on the park who enjoyed watching his team and getting the odd touch. Now Chris can be counted to always be there to put pressure on the opposition or get the crucial interception and turn the defence into attack. Confidence was always the key and now that he has that anything is possible. In a way I see a lot of what I was like as a young player with Chris. Chris will develop into a good midfielder who is integral in setting up play for the strikers.

Clancy - Forward. Simply said, Clancy loves a goal. Even if it meant running over the top of a player to get the ball.  The challange was the passing game and learning to either pass the ball or get into a position to receive te ball.  The great improvement for Clancy though was towards the end of the season when he would rally back in defence and keep the team positive on the field. Clancy is determined to be striker though and with the determination and hunger, he has a gereat chance to win a few golden boots in the future.


Dayne - A key defender. I can not be prouder of where Dayne is now with his football. From the start of the season all I have wanted from Dayne is faith in his own ability. He can do what he wants to do and now he is realising it. He is the best player in the team in understanding what I have wanted from them in pressuring a player without committing to a tackle. When watching him running you can see a determinition that wasn't there at the start of the season. Dayne will be a crucial defender that holds the line when a fast break is made and slows the play up unitl backup arrives.


Hayden - My sweeper.  It is always challenging coaching your own son but he wouldn't want it any other way. I could ramble on a lot about Hayden being a proud father but for me as a coach it is his improvement in handling hard knocks in play and criticisms from myself. Hayden has made great improvement in avoiding the malicious tackle and also making runs with the ball when in space rather than just kicking it away. Hayden's read of the play will always have him earmarked for a central role.

Jack - Central Midfielder. Jack has the ability and can read the play but it was getting him to do it on the field at the start of the season. Jack almost seems to be taking it easy on players to be fair. What I am wanting is to see the killer instinct. I see it at training alot but now we are starting to see it more on the field. Jack is setting up players very well and is starting to use that big right boot he has more often. In the future Jack will be the no-nonsense player who controls the play and can nail those goals from thirty yards with a blistering kick.

Owen - A forward. Owen is another goal scorer but of a different mould. Owen has the ability but was lacking instinct to pass the ball or run into the right spot to receive the ball. Owen has improvement greatly in his positioning and read of the play. And his ability to steal a ball in defence and turn it into attack has become a great asset of his. Although one of the smaller players I can always guarantee he is up there for the header and usually gets to it first. Owen will always be an attacking player and will be great goal sneak who has the ball on a string.

Riley - Reluctant mid-fielder. I say reluctant because Riley naturally is a mid-fielder but likes to stay forward. From the start of the season, the improvement in Riley's running and passing game is almost a revelation. He adds a stability to the mid-field and doesn't give up where in the past he was tentative at the ball. Now Riley has found an extra gear or two when in possession and shows a determination that I have been trying to find for awhile. Riley will be great mid-fielder that is the glue all teams need.

Sam - ??  I am unsure where Sam will end up as player but that is due to Sam unfortunately breaking his collar bone and missing a lot of action. From where Sam started though and where he was before the injury Sam went from being a player that chased the ball everywhere regardless of who had it, to making sure he was either maintaining possession or getting into a good position in attack. Sam's passing and running with the ball were showing great improvements and with his speed can be a great attacking player.


Tihan - Deft Mid-fielder. Tihan has more ability then he realises and this was always the battle. At the start of the season Tihan was always there but seemed to be watcing the ball and waiting for it. A lot of what was required was confidence and that is certainly there now. Tihan is now showing great footwork and tackling. In a crowded mid-field Tihan has a knack of getting the ball and working it out. Tihan will develop into a good mid-fielder and will be crucial in turning defence into attack.

As a team though we are seeing some great progress. They have gone from a rabble chasing the ball to being reasonably structured for a junior side. I give less direction on the field now and the natural leaders are coming out on the field.  They set up their positions well and are understanding some simple tactics very well.  We may not have won every game but I have been happy with how they have played every game. Most goals scored against us are either very good goals or from mistakes made in defence. This is the best way for them to learn. More importantly they have learnt more about themselves as a team and individuals this year. They now what positions not only they play but what each other play. When asked they can also tell you what each player is good at and not good at. Any team that understands it strengths and weaknesses is a good team.  As the coach though I want to give credit to all the parents who should be very proud of their sons. Their attitude and nature makes them a pleasure to coach. I keep coming back to coach every year because I want to see them all develop and I love the game of football. But also I take great pride in their achievements and willingness to learn more and take in that knowledge. 

NRL Finals Week 2 Preview

With the first round gone the Grand Final picture is starting to look a little clearer or is it. On last weeks form one can hardly expect 2 of the teams playing this weekend to really threaten.

Manly vs NQ Cowboys

After last weeks ordinary effort against the Bulldogs and with the Cowboys in scintillating attacking form one would expect Manly to crash out and be gone by half time. Manly have a tendency to only play half a game of football and they cannot switch off against a side that only needs 20 minutes to blow most teams off the park. There is too much class in the attack of the Cowboys for Manly to think that they can outscore them in a free flowing game and it will be even harder for Manly to stop a rampaging forward pack that creates all the room for the attacking options from North Queensland. Thurston is in great form but it is not the combination with Bowen that will have the Sea Eagles worried but also Michael Morgan. With Matai out and Lyon only a chance  North Queensland will be too good down the edges.

Cowboys will keep the momentum rolling and post a 20 plus victory over a stuttering  Manly.

Souths vs Canberra

Canberra easily accounted for Cronulla last week but with Croker out injured will face a tougher prospect this week. Souths on the other hand can;t be any worse than last week and it is yet to be seen if they can pay the intense football required to win high pressure matches. If Souths struggle again in the forwards then it will be another cake walk for the Raiders. If the raiders fail to stop the forward momentum though then Souths will steamroll their way and survive another week. I can't see either team progressing any further though. If Dave Taylor continues in the same vain as last week he will cost his side any chance of winning as I feel he will find time on the bench if his antics continue.

Souths in a high scoring affair but will see injuries and reports hinder their chance of going further,

NRL Finals Review: Week 1

The first round of the NRL finals have been played and so far there have not been too many surprises. With the new finals system in place and no major upset has occurred. What has been shown is the teams that were never really going to compete in the Grand Final are gone and some questions are being asked of the rest.

Bulldogs v Manly - 16-10

Pre-game tip: Bulldogs but changed to Manly pre-game (wrong), an injury to a key player (Jamie Lyon) and a reportable offence (Matai and King) it was a close game as predicted.

The Bulldogs deserved the win but will not be taking the win lightly as they only scraped across the line against a team that never looked like they were good enough to win on the night. I picked a tight game here and wasn't let down, but the standard of play was now where near the intensity that should have been expected by two top 4 teams.  Although Manly were in front at half time it never felt like they were going to win and once Lyon limped off with an injury. What will be a concern for both coaches though was the standard of play. Neither team will go any further if they play to the same standard next game. Both teams had too many unforced errors. With manly also having Matai and King on report they will be sure to be enjoying an off season after next weekend. The Bulldogs will also struggle in their next game if they continue to make the same mistakes again in a high intensity match. In finals you cannot get away with two poor performances in a row.

Melbourne v Souths 24-6

Pre-game tip: Storm Comfortably, Souths need to control the ball (key issue), Injury to an International (thankfully no), reportable shoulder charge (again thankfully no)

The Storm controlled the game from start to finish and showed what Finals football is all about. At no point did Souths even look like making it a close game and this was due to a ruthless Storm outfit. Souths will never win a finals game if they continue to show poor discipline and not maintain possession. Regardless of how good your fullback is if the engine room isn't working and you are on the back foot it is hard to perform. Melbourne on the other hand had a high completion rate, perfect kicking game and too much skill all over the park. Souths have got to learn tht it takes more than emotion and a lot of talk to win big games.

Cowboys v Brisbane 33-16

Pre-game tip: Head said Cowboys, heart said Broncos (I will take it), Too many points in the Cowboys and hard to stop on a roll (too true)

Cowboys deserved the win and are a big threat to go all the way. Brisbane never looked like winning this one and the halves were a big factor. Brisbane just don't have either playmakers or ability to create points that is required to win big games. The Cowboys just had too much speed, skill and want to win for the Broncos to handle. If Brisbane want to get back to being a force they really need to address their structure and halves combination. All teams will be wary of the Cowboys as this is a team that can put points on the board from anywhere on the field but also has the mongrel in the engine room to lay the platform. Cowboys will make light work of manly next weekend.

Raiders v Cronulla 34-16

Pre-game tip: Raiders by 20 (by 18), Gallen explained a basic rule after a whinge (more than once this happened), Jeremy Smith on report (correct), Video ref decision no one agrees with (if you think the "ref call" decision was the right call then I stand corrected)

Canberra showed Cronulla just were not up to the standard required. Whilst Gallen may have thought his team were close and getting a hard run on the field, Canberra were the rightful winners and the score is reflection of the difference between the two. Until Cronulla start playing with the right attitude and stop with the rubbish and blaming everyone else they will never make a grand-final. Gallen needs to stop worrying about complaining and just play the game. If he is so concerned about the refs decisions against him then he needs to also tell the ref that he is thankful for all the ones that go his way. All the tries Cronulla scored had questionable and blatant forward passes. Also questions need to be asked on why a team doctor injected pain killers into Todd Carney's achillies before the game and at half time with the playmaker coming off injured in the second half due to an injury to the same achillies.  Canberra though need to be given a lot of credit for their performance and should be too much for Souths to handle next week.

After watching all four games I would like to see the Final played between teams from either Melbourne, Cowboys, Raiders and Bulldogs. Manly and Souths were just too dour and unworthy to expect a great performance in a final. Even the Bulldogs are lucky for a mention but if they play the same in their next game they will have the honour of being a minor premier that gets to watch from a hotel room on an end of season holiday.

NRL Finals Preview

Now the the dregs have been sorted out we are now left to see the cream of the crop battle it out for the right to last one more round. Regardless of form, everyone knows that when the pressure is on it all changes and it is a matter of the team that steps up on the day knowing that it all lays on the line.

Bulldogs v manly

This is the game that most are tipping for the Grand Final but whoever loses this game will struggle in the next and injuries are the key. Without the luxury of resting key players it is not only a matter of winning the game but also hoping that no major injuries are suffered to key players. I am picking the Bulldogs to win this game as long as the game is allowed to be open and does not turn into an arm wrestle with little room to move if they refs do not keep control of the 10 metre line. Manly have been good but of late are not playing hard for the whole game. The only question is how the Bulldogs halves handle the pressure of the big game and more importantly how Barba stands up to finals intensity pressure. Bulldogs in a tight one.

Melbourne v Souths

Any team with Inlgis is a formidable one but Melbourne don't lack in exciting fire power either. Melbourne have the experience and should win an arm wrestle in this one. Also the home ground advantage is a bigger issue when it involves a non-sydney club.  If  Melbourne struggle to dominate in the forwards though Souths will run rampant on the fringes. Ball control is what will hurt Souths though. Everyone knows they have the ability to win, it is just a matter of the control they show to win a tight game.  Storm comfortably.

North Queensland v Brisbane

North Queenlsand deservedly get a home final and Brisbane well and truly limped into the finals. The Cowboys are a good chance to go all the way but it is always hard to discount Brisbane.  It is always hard to tip against Brisbane in finals and they have the team to do it, it is just a matter of their halves finally clicking in a way that they haven't done all season. For Brisbane to win this one they will have to win it in the forwards and allow no time or space for Thurston and Bowen.  The Cowboys though are a team that have a lot of points in them and if they get on a roll are hard to stop.  Even if it is a close game this is a team that can find length of the field tries at any time and that is the biggest difference between the teams.  It is always hard to pick a derby but on form the Cowboys should come away with a win but for some reason I have a feeling that the Broncos are up for something big. Hard to call but I am sticking with the Broncos.

Canberra v Cronulla

It didn't seem that long ago and everyone was calling for the head of the coach at the Raiders and now they are in top gear and should continue on with a win over the Sharks.  Having to travel the Sharks will struggle and everyone knows how Carney goes in high pressure games.  This game will see plenty of poor kicking from the Sharks and a few conversations between Gallen and the ref on what the rules of the game are. Raiders by a few.